Author ' s response to reviews Title : Reporting Recommendations for

Author ' s response to reviews Title : Impact of quality of evidence on the strength of recommendations

Author ' s response to reviews Title : Estimated GFR reporting is not sufficient to allow detection of chronic kidney disease

Author ' s response to reviews Title : Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance : Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change ( ERIC ) study

Evaluation of the Quality of Writing of the Title and Abstract of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Papers Published in the Journals of the Iran,s Universities of Medical Sciences in 2016, Based on the CONSORT Checklist: A Descriptive Study

Background and Objectives: Given the fact that randomized controlled clinical trials are more valid than other research methods to determine the therapeutic effects of treatment, proper design and accurate reporting is of particular importance. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of writing the title and abstract of randomized clinical trials of Iranian medical unive...

A PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of...